Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘evangelism’

In a day when evangelical and Reformed seminaries seem embarrassed by a straight-forward reading of the first two chapters of Genesis, the faculty of Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary has succinctly and unequivocally made the case that the six days of creation were six consecutive twenty-four hour days. You can read this excellent statement here.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

For those concerned about the spiritual state of Christian churches, we need to examine the gospel which is being presented. Is it the gospel of the Bible, the gospel that points hearers to the absolute holiness of God, the depravity and rebellion of man, the substitutionary atonement of Christ, the call for repentance and faith in Christ alone?

A false gospel is far too prevalent in our churches. It is the “gospel” of a “kinder, gentler” God who needs for you to like him so he can bless you. It teaches that we have done bad things but God still loves us if we will but give our hearts to him. That the Lord Jesus took upon himself the wrath of God in the place of believing sinners is taught too rarely. Though certainly no evangelical, H. Richard Niebuhr criticized the churches of his day: “A God without wrath brought men without sin into a kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a cross.” Unfortunately, things are no better, in the United States at least, a half-century later.

The video below is indicative of the false gospel so many children are hearing. Watch and weep.

For a better understanding of evangelizing children, see “Childhood Conversion,” by Jim Eliff.

Read Full Post »

One of the distinctives which make Baptists “Baptist” is the belief in a regenerate church membership. In other words, only those who profess faith in Christ and give evidence of regeneration are to be baptized and admitted into the membership of the local church. Because we hold that the Scriptures restrict baptism to believers (with all due respect to my Presbyterian brothers and sisters, whom I love dearly and often envy!), fewer baptisms means that are fewer conversions.

During the past several months there has been a lot of hand wringing among Southern Baptist Convention leaders at the fewer number of baptisms reported by churches throughout the convention. Strategies have been put forth and non-program programs have been implemented to reverse the trend. (I say “non-program programs” because we’re supposedly past programs, so the new “programs” are said not to be programs, but “if it walks like a duck . . . .”)

The latest lament has come from Ron Herrod, recently-elected president of the Conference of Southern Baptist Evangelists. Dr. Herrod, doubtlessly a man of integrity and motivated by a concern for those who are not Christians, believes that the reversal of baptisms requires a movement of God and change in strategy. Pastors need to take more members on mission trips, train their members to do evangelism, and engage vocational evangelists to hold revival meetings in their churches. Baptist Press reported,
“As an evangelist and president of COSBE, Herrod encourages current pastors to take advantage of God-called evangelists who are trained to ‘draw the net.’ There are certain people God has gifted that when ‘the invitation is given, the harvest comes,’ he said.”

BP’s story is most telling,

In addition, Herrod noted churches that hold revival meetings require 24 resident members to win one person to Christ, compared to 36 resident members to win one to Christ in churches that do not hold revival meetings.

‘Use God’s gift to the church — the evangelist — on a regular basis to help draw the net and bring in the harvest,’ he challenged.

The former pastor is dismayed over a trend he sees in some churches to not offer an invitation at every service.

‘I don’t understand pastors who do not give an invitation. An invitation is biblical,’ he said. ‘What if a lost person is there and he walks away without an opportunity [to make a profession of faith]. We have failed to do what God calls us to do.’

Actually, I think Dr. Herrod is mistaken on most of his points and is part of the continuing problem, not the solution. First, the very office of vocational evangelist is without biblical support, at least the type of vocational evangelist which Dr. Herrod represents. Ephesians 4:11 speaks of evangelists, but these are better understood to be what we called “missionaries,” not a man engaged to hold “revival meetings” in a local church.

Second, the idea of hiring a man—the vocational evangelist—to lead services in a church “on a regular basis to help draw the net and bring in the harvest” is simply silly, and again, without biblical support. The apostle Paul reminds us, “What then is Apollos? What is Paul? Servants through whom you believed, as the Lord assigned to each. I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth” (1 Corinthians 3:5-6, ESV). Poor Paul could only plant. Where was the vocational evangelist to come behind him to “draw the net”?

Third, the modern invitation system is itself an unbiblical practice. There is no mention of its practice in the Scriptures. Church history reveals its practice to be only some two centuries old. One cannot help but wonder how the Church survived for eighteen centuries without giving “invitations” and “altar calls.”

I contend that one of the reasons for fewer baptisms is that Southern Baptists and other evangelicals have engaged in unbiblical practices and offered a less-than-biblical gospel (such as “asking Jesus into your heart”) for so long that people have been conditioned to believe the gospel really doesn’t matter. After all, only a third of Southern Baptists bother to show up for worship on any given Sunday. Attending corporate worship is the easiest thing a Christian does; non-attendance is most telling about one’s spiritual state. Our methodologies have resulted in a lot of decisions, and those churches which engage a vocational evangelist may witness more decisions, but I fear that most of those decisions are not true conversions.

As I stated above, I think Dr. Herrod is an honorable man motivated by a concern for those without Christ. He is sincere, but I think he’s sincerely wrong.

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: